The specifi cs of Monotheism (tawhid) as “a thing-in-itself”. On the Evolution of Islamic Theology in the Late Russian Empire
https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2021-14-4-866-882
Abstract
In this paper, we will try to give a dynamic characterization of the object and the subject of Modern theology among the Tatar Muslims on the exemplar of the theological views of ‘Abdunnasīr Qursavi (1776–1812), Shihabutdin Marjani (1818–1889) and Murad Ramzi (1854–1934) (and partly of their contemporaries). The incognizability of the Creator and the faith as “a thing-in-itself” transformed Tatar Religious Epistemology into the cognition of more defi nite realities. Agnosticism in the question of God’s attributes led to the anthropocentric features of theological worldviews. The above-mentioned chain of theologians demonstrates not only the continuity of the Tatar Theology, but also refl ects the dynamics of the evolution of the attitude towards the madhhabs and towards the role of an individual, the specifi cs of the Naqshbandi-Mujaddidiya Sufi brotherhood, as well as the Ottoman ‘usul fi qh’ in the modernization period of the early XVIII century. In general, the works of Qursavi constitute a certain system of views that can be considered as a certain cornerstone, the so-called ‘starting point’ of Tatar School of Theology.
About the Author
D. R. GilmutdinovRussian Federation
Daniiar R. Gilmutdinov, Cand. Sci. (History), Senior Researcher
Kazan
References
1. Abu-n-Nasr Kursavi. Nastavlenie ljudej na put' istiny (al-Irshad li-l-'ibad) [Guidance to the Straight Path]. Тr. from Arab. Kazan: Tatar Publishing House; 2005. 304 p. (In Russian)
2. Spannaus Nathan. Islamic Thought and Revivalism in the Russian Empire: An Intellectual Biography of Abū Nasr Qūrsāwī (1776–1812): Ph.D thesis. Montréal: McGill University Press; 2012. 267 р.
3. Allama al-muhakkik Shihabutdin al-Mardzhani. Kitab hizamat al'-havashi li-idahat al'-gavashi [Code of Commentaries for eliminating the vail of ignorance]. Kazan, 1889. 443 p. (In Arabic)
4. Alljama Abi-n-nasr Abdunnasyr b. Ibragim al-Bulgari al-Kursavi. Kitab irshad li-l-ibad [Guidance to the Straight Path]. Kazan, 1321 h. 67 p. (In Arabic)
5. Abu-n-nasr Abdennasyr b. Ibragim al-Kazani al-Hanafi al-Hanifi . Sharh muhtasar al-Manar [The commentaries on ‘Mukhtasar al-Manār]. 134 p. [Electronic source]. Available at: https://darul-kutub.com/uploads/books/7683e5ead51a4594c52be15c9fc03f3cba4fdb35.pdf (Accessed: 31.05.2021). (In Arabic)
6. Gabdrahim Utyz-Imjani al-Bulgari. Risalja al-irshadij ja [Guiding pamphlet]. Izbrannoe [Selected works]. Kazan, 2007, pp. 207–224. (In Russian)
7. Kudaynetov Said Ali. Şihâbüddîn el-Mercânî’nin Usûl-i Fıkıh Anlayışı Hizâmetu’l-Havâşî li İzâhati’l-Ğavâşî adlı eseri bağlamında. Yüksek Lisans tezi [Sh. Marjani’s views on ‘Usul Fikh’ in his “Hizamat al'-havashi li-idahat al'-gavashi”. Тhesis]. Ankara Üniversitesi Press; 2008. VII +155 p. (In Turkish)
8. Qursavi Abu-n-Nasr. Pis'mo ‘Abdarrakhmanu b. Mukhammadsharifu al-Kirmani, prepodavatelyu (mudarris) iz Seitovskoy slobody [A letter to ‘Abd arRahmān b. Muhammād Sharīf al-Kirmāni, to a tutor (mudarris) from ‘Sayid’ settlement] [Electronic source]. Available at: http://www.islam-portal.ru/e-store/books/95/863/. (Accessed: 31.05.2021). (In Russian)
9. Bigiev M. Shәrigat' әsaslary [The Basics of Islamic Law]. Petrograd: A.-M. Maqsudov’s Publifhing House; 1917. 72 р. (In Old-Tatar)
10. Okur Kâşif Hamdi. Osmanlılarda Fıkıh Usûlü Çalışmaları (Hâdimî Örneği) [The investigations on Ottoman’s ‘Usul Fikh’]. İstanbul: Mizan Yayınevi Publ.; 2010. 254 р. (In Turkish)
Review
For citations:
Gilmutdinov D.R. The specifi cs of Monotheism (tawhid) as “a thing-in-itself”. On the Evolution of Islamic Theology in the Late Russian Empire. Minbar. Islamic Studies. 2021;14(4):866-882. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2021-14-4-866-882