Preview

Minbar. Islamic Studies

Advanced search

On Averroes’ response to al-Ghazali’s critique of Falsafa interpretation of bodily resurrection

https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2023-16-4-816-832

Abstract

This article serves as an introduction to the translation of the section on bodily resurrection, from the book «The Incoherence of the Incoherence» (Tahāfut at-Tahāfut) of the peripatetic philosopher Ibn Rushd (Averroes, 1126–1198), written in response to the work of the theologian-asharite al-Ghazali (1058–1111) «The Incoherence of the Philosophers» (Tahāfut al-Falāsifa). The paper reveals the presentist-intellectualist intention of Falsafa eschatology; it also gives a compendium of the polemics of two thinkers around two related issues that are the rational proofs for the immateriality of the soul and its incorruptibility. Moreover, the research provides a brief summary of the section of the Ghazalian book regarding resurrection. The authors also disclose the connection between the book of Ibn Rushd and his earlier theological and polemical treatises «On the correlation between philosophy and religion» and «On the methods of proof for the principles of creed».

The article is intended to serve as an introduction to the translation of the section on bodily resurrection, which concludes the book of the peripatetic philosopher Ibn Rushd (Averroes, 1126–1198) «The Inconsistency of Inconsistency», compiled in refutation of the critical treatise «The Inconsistency of the Teachings of the Philosophers» by the mutaqallimah-ash'arite al-Ghazali (1058–1111).

About the Authors

T. Ibrahim
Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Tawfik Ibrahim, Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Full Professor, Head Research Fellow at the Center of Arabic and Islamic Studies; Deputy Head Chairman of the Higher Examining Body (Theology Section) at the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation, Advisor to «Minbar. Islamic Studies» periodical

Moscow



N. V. Efremova
Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Natalia V. Efremova, Сand. Sci. (Philosophy), Senior Research Fellow at the Center of Arabic and Islamic Studies; Editorial board Member for «Minbar. Islamic Studies» periodical

Moscow



References

1. Ibrahim T., Efremova N.V. Ob otvete Ibn-Rushda na gazaliyskuyu kritiku filosofii [On Averroes’ response to al-Ghazali’s critique of Philosophy]. Minbar. Islamic Studies. 2020;13(2):378-400. DOI: 10.31162/2618-9569-2020-13-2-378-400. (In Russian)

2. Ibn Rushd. Tahāfut at-Tahāfut. Beirut: Markaz dirāsāt al-wahda al-‘arabīyya, 1998. 600 p. (In Arabic). 2а. Ibn Rushd. Neposledovatel'nost' «Neposledovatel'nosti» [The Incoherence of the Incoherence (Russian translation)]. In: Srednevekovaya arabo-musul'manskaya filosofiya v perevodakh A.V. Sagadeeva [Medieval Arab-Muslim Philosophy in A.V. Sagadeev’s translations]. Vol. 3. Moscow: Marjani Press; 2010. P. 141–272. (In Russian). 2б. Averroes (Ibn Rushd). Oproverzhenie Oproverzheniya [The Incoherence of the Incoherence (Russian translation)]. Kiev: UTsIMM Press; St. Petersburg: Aleteyya Press; 1999. 685 p. (In Russian)

3. Algazel. Tahāfot al-Falāsifat. Beirut: Impremerie catholique; 1927. 30, 447 p. (In Arabic). 3а. al-Ghazali. Tahāfut al-Falāsifa. Cairo: Dār al-Ma‘ārif; 1972. 371 p. (In Arabic). 3b. al-Ghazali. Krushenie pozicij filosofov [The Incoherence of the Philosophers (Russian translation)]. Moscow: Ansar Press; 2007. 277 p. (In Russian)

4. Ibn Rushd. O sootnoshenii filosofii i religii [On the Correlation between Philosophy and Religion]. Musul'manskaya filosofiya (fal'safa): antologiya [Muslim Philosophy (Falsafa): an Anthology]. Ibrahim T.K., Efremova N.V. (eds). Kazan: The Spiritual Directorate of Muslims of the Republic of Tatarstan; 2009, pp. 547–581. (In Russian)

5. Ibn Rushd (Averroes). On the Methods of Substantiating the Principles of Creed. Part Five. Minbar. Islamic Studies. 2019;12(4):1003–1049. DOI: 10.31162/2618-9569-2019-12-4-1003-1049 (In Russian)

6. Ibn Sina. Psihologiya [Psychology]. Ibn Sina. Iscelenie: teologiya [Healing: Theology]. Vol. 2. Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ.; 2022, рp. 7–183. (In Russian)

7. Ibn Sina. Iscelenie: teologiya [Healing: Theology]. Vol. 1. Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ.; 2022. 720 p. (In Russian)

8. Ibrahim T.K., Efremova N.V. Musul'manskaya religioznaya filosofiya: fal'safa. [Islamic Religious Philosophy: Falsafa]. Kazan: Kazan University Press; 2014. 236 p. (In Russian)

9. Ibn Sina (Avicenna) Al-Isharat wa-t-tanbihat [On Metaphysics]. Part four. Orientalistica. 2019;2(2):337–374. DOI: 10.31696/2618-7043-2019-2-2-337-374 (In Russian)

10. ash-Shirazi. Dawābit al-ma‘rifa al-mussammāt Sharh al-Hidāya al-athīrīyya. Vol. 2. Cairo: Maktabat ath-Thaqāfa; 2008. 270 p. (In Arabic)

11. Ibn Sina. Kniga znaniya [The Book of knowledge (Russian translation)]. Ibn Sina. Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedeniya [Selected philosophical works]. Moscow: Nauka Press; 1980, рр. 59–228. (In Russian)

12. Ibn Sina. An-Najāt. Tehran: Dānishgāh-i Tihrān; 1978. 783 p. (In Arabic)

13. al-Ghazali. Maqāsid al-Falāsifa. Cairo: Dār al-Ma‘ārif; 1960. 420 p. (In Arabic)

14. Ibn-Rushd (Averroes). The Incoherence of the Incoherence. Part Four. Minbar. Islamic Studies. 2021;14(2):337–369. DOI: 10.31162/2618-9569-2021-14-2-337-369 (In Russian)

15. al-Iji. Al-Mawāqif fī ‘ilm al-kalām. Beirut: ‘Ālam al-kutub; 430+24 p. (In Arabic)

16. at-Taftazani. Sharh al-Maqāsid. Vol. 3, 5. Beirut: ‘Ālam al-kutub; 1998. 376, 323 p. (In Arabic)

17. Ibrahim T., Efremova N.V. O modernistskoj recepcii fal'safskoj teologii [On the modernist reception of Falsafa theology]. Islamskaya mysl': tradiciya i sovremennost'. Religiozno-filosofskiy ezhegodnik [Islamic Thought: Tradition and Modernity. Religious-philosophical Yearbook]. Is. 7. Moscow: Medina Press; 2023, рр. 475–548. (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Ibrahim T., Efremova N.V. On Averroes’ response to al-Ghazali’s critique of Falsafa interpretation of bodily resurrection. Minbar. Islamic Studies. 2023;16(4):816-832. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2023-16-4-816-832

Views: 345


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2618-9569 (Print)
ISSN 2712-7990 (Online)