Preview

Minbar. Islamic Studies

Advanced search

Ibn-Rushd (Averroes). The Incoherence of the Incoherence. Part Four

https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2021-14-2-337-369

Abstract

This series of publications is a translation of selected sections from the book “The Incoherence of the Incoherence” (Tahafut at-Tahafut) by a peripatetic philosopher Ibn Rushd (Averroes, d. 1198), written in response to the book by asharite mutakallim al-Ghazali (d. 1111) “The Incoherence of the Philosophers” (Tahafut al-Falasifa).

In this part Ibn Rushd completes the analysis of al-Ghazali’s criticism of the philosophical proofs for the eternity of the world. Here are the answers to the last part of Ghazalian objections to the second proof (“from the eternity of time”), as well as to the objections to the third (“from the eternity of possibility”) and the fourth (“from the eternity of matter”).

About the Authors

T. Ibrahim
Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Tawfik Ibrahim, Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Full Professor, Head Research Fellow at the Centre of Arabic and Islamic Studies, Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, Deputy Head Chairman of the Higher Examining Body (Theology Section) at the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation, Advisor to Minbar. Islamic Studies periodical

Moscow



N. V. Efremova
Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Natalia V. Efremova, Сand. Sci. (Philosophy), Senior Research Fellow at the Division of Oriental Philosophies, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Editorial board Member for Minbar. Islamic Studies periodical

Moscow



References

1. Ibrahim T., Efremova N.V. On Averroes’ response to al-Ghazali’s critique of philosophy. Minbar. Islamic Studies. 2020;13(2):378–400. DOI: 10.31162/2618-9569-2020-13-2-378-400 (In Russian)

2. а. Ibrahim T., Efremova N.V. Ibn-Rushd (Averroes). The Incoherence of the Incoherence. Part One. Minbar. Islamic Studies. 2020;13(3):605–636. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2020-13-3-605-636 (In Russian)

3. b. Ibrahim T., Efremova N.V. Ibn-Rushd (Averroes). The Incoherence of the Incoherence. Part Two. Minbar. Islamic Studies. 2020;13(4):863–899. DOI: 10.31162/2618-9569-2020-13-4-863-899 (In Russian)

4. c. Ibrahim T., Efremova N.V. Ibn-Rushd (Averroes). The Incoherence of the Incoherence. Part Three. Minbar. Islamic Studies. 2021;4(1):117–151. DOI:10.31162/2618-9569-2021-14-1-117-151 (In Russian)

5. Ibn Rushd. Tahafut at-Tahafut. Beirut: Markaz dirasat al-wahda al-‘arabiyya; 1998. 600 p. (In Arabic)

6. а. Ibn Rushd. Tahāfot at-tahāfot. Bouyges M. (ed.). Beirut: Imprimerie catholique; 1930. 680 p. (In Arabic)

7. Algazel. Tahāfot al-Falāsifat. Bouyges M. (ed.). Beirut: Impremerie catholique; 1927. 30, 447 p. (In Arabic)

8. а. al-Ghazali. Tahafut al-Falasifa. Cairo: Dar al-Ma‘arif; 1972. 371 p. (In Arabic)

9. b. al-Ghazali. Krushenie pozicij filosofov [The Incoherence of the Philosophers (Russian translation)]. Moscow: Ansar; 2007. 277 p. (In Russian)

10. Ibn Sina. Iscelenie (fragmenty) [The Healing (excerpts)]. Musul’manskaya filosofiya (fal’safa): antologiya [Muslim philosophy (Falsafa): An Anthology]. Ibrahim T.K., Efremova N.V. (eds). Kazan: Spiritual Directorate of Muslims of the Republic of Tatarstan; 2009, pp. 309–456. (In Russian)

11. Aristotle. Fizika [Physics]. Sochineniya v chetyryokh tomakh. Т. 3. [Writings in four volumes Vol. 3.]. Moscow: Mysl; 1976, pp. 61–262. (In Russian)

12. Galen. O zavisimosti svojstv dushi ot temperamentov tela [The soul’s traits depend on bodily temperament]. Appendix to: Balalykin D.A. Sushchnostnoe edinstvo duhovnogo i telesnogo v teoretiko-prakticheskoj sisteme Galena. Сhast› I. [An essential unity of spiritual and material in Galen’s theoretical and practical system. Part I]. Filosofskie nauki [Philosophical Sciences]. 2014;3(62):123–145. (In Russian)

13. al-Ghazali. Nisha sveta [The niche of lights]. “Nastavleniya pravitelyam” i drugie sochineniya [“Admonitions to the governors” and other works.]. Moscow: Ansar; 2004, pp. 199–252. (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Ibrahim T., Efremova N.V. Ibn-Rushd (Averroes). The Incoherence of the Incoherence. Part Four. Minbar. Islamic Studies. 2021;14(2):337-369. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2021-14-2-337-369

Views: 1066


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2618-9569 (Print)
ISSN 2712-7990 (Online)