Child custody after a divorce in Islam and in Russian legislation (comparative analysis)
https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2024-17-3-659-677
Abstract
The article describes the negative consequences that result from the lack of a competent approach to solving the problem associated with determining the right to care for minor children after parental divorce. The main focus is on explaining the most important norms of Islamic family law, and Russian legislation in matters of the right to care for the children in the event of parental divorce. A comparative analysis is carried out between these norms, indicating points of contact and differences. The purpose of the study is to reveal the problem related to the right to care for the minor children that Muslims in the Russian Federation face during the divorce proceedings. The author, in this article, draws attention to the fact that due to some differences in these legal norms, Muslims may have difficulties associated with the desire to simultaneously comply with the rules of their religion in the legal field and not violate the provisions of Russian law. The author also discloses the ways out of the current situation, combining, where possible, the rules of law of the both approaches. The scientific novelty of the paper lies in the very study of the key problems that Muslims in Russia face in the matters related to the divorce process, in particular, regarding the right to care for the children after their parents’ divorce. The research provides the comparative analysis between the norms of Islam and the rules of the Family Code of the Russian Federation on the matter. As a result, it was determined that the Muslim community needs to know and study both the norms of Islamic Law regarding the right to care for the minor children after a divorce, and the position of Russian legislation. It is very important to learn how to combine these norms. Also, in case of a dispute, such issues should be addressed to the qadi. It will help you avoid mistakes and determine who has the priority right to care for the children.
About the Author
B. M. ArshievRussian Federation
Batraz M. Arshiev, Doctoral Student
Bolgar
References
1. Muhammad al-San‘ani. Subul al-salam sharh bulugh al-maram [The ways of the world - interpretation of the book “Bulugh al-maram”]. Vol. 3. Cairo: Dar al-Hadith; 2004. 376 p. (In Arabic)
2. Krachkovsky I.Yu. Koran (Smyslovoy perevod) [Quran (Meaning translation)]. Moscow: Raritet Press; 1990. 536 p. (In Russian)
3. Muhammad Ibn Rushd. Al-Muqaddimat al-mumahhidat [Useful premises]. Vol. 1. Beirut: al-Gharb al-Islami; 1988. 640 p. (In Arabic)
4. Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj an-Naysaburi. Sahih Muslim [The Compendium of the Hadiths by Imam Muslim]. Riyadh: Tuwaiq; 2008. 1290 p. (In Arabic)
5. Ibn ‘Abidin. Radd al-muhtar ‘ala al-durr al-mukhtar (Hashiyat Ibn ‘Abidin). [The return of the troubled one to the exquisite pearl (Notes of Ibn ‘Abidin)]. Vol. 3. Beirut: al-Fikr; 1966. 851 p. (In Arabic)
6. Muhammad al-Dusuqi. Hashiyat al-Dusuki ʻala al-sharh al-kabir [Comments of al-Dusuqi to the “Great Interpretation”]. Vol. 2. Beirut: al-Fikr; [n. d.]. 534 p. (In Arabic)
7. Khalil al-Khattab. Mawahib al-jalil sharh mukhtasar shaykh al-Khalil [The Gifts of the Majestic. Comments on the book “Mukhtasar Sheikh Khalil”]. Vol. 4. Nouakchott: al-Ridwan; 2010. 641 p. (In Arabic)
8. Ibn Hajar al-Haytami. Tuhfat al-muhtaj bi-sharh al-minhaj [A gift to someone in need of a commentary on the book “al-Minhaj”]. Vol. 3. Cairo: Dar al-Hadith; 2016. 640 p. (In Arabic)
9. Mansur al-Buhuti. Sharh muntaha al-iradat [Comments to the book “Muntaha al-iradat”]. Vol. 3. Beirut: ‘Alam al-kutub; 1993. 647 p. (In Arabic)
10. Аbu Bakr al-Kasani. Badai‘ al-sanai‘ fi tartib al-sharai‘ [Rare arts in regulating legislation]. Vol. 5. Beirut: al-Kutub al-‘ilmiyyah; 2002. 576 p. (In Arabic)
11. Abu Daud Sulaiman ibn Ash‘as. Sunan Abi-Dawud [The Collection of the hadiths by Abu Dawud]. Riyadh: al-Salam; 1999. 944 p. (In Arabic)
12. Malik ibn Anas. Al-Muwattaʼ [The Path]. T. 2. Beirut: al-Risalah, 1991. 542 p. (In Arabic)
13. Musa al-Hajjawi. Al-Iqnaʻ fi fiqh al-imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal [Satisfying in the Fiqh of Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal]. Vol. 4. Beirut: al-Ma‘rifah; 2009. 475 p. (In Arabic)
14. Mansur al-Buhuti. Kashshaf al-qinaʻ ʻan al-iqnaʻ [Tearing the veil off the “al-Iqna‘”]. Vol. 13. Riyadh: KSA Ministry of Justice; 2008. 524 p. (In Arabic)
15. Semeynyy Kodeks RF ot 29 dekabrya 1995 g. №223-FZ (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami, redaktsiya, deystvuyushchaya s 1 sentyabrya 2022 goda) [Family Code of the Russian Federation dated December 29, 1995. №223-FZ (with amendments and additions, the version valid from September 1, 2022)]. Moscow, 68 p. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Arshiev B.M. Child custody after a divorce in Islam and in Russian legislation (comparative analysis). Minbar. Islamic Studies. 2024;17(3):659-677. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2024-17-3-659-677