The methodology of the shafi‘i madhhab and the ash‘ari school of ‘aqidah as a factor in countering religious extremism
https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2026-19-2-378-388
Abstract
The article analyzes the theological and methodological potential of the Shafi‘i madhhab and the Ash‘ari creed as internal mechanisms for countering religious extremism in the Dagestani context. The aim of the study is to identify the doctrinal and legal foundations of the Sunni tradition that ensure its resilience against radical interpretations of religion. The methodological framework includes historical-doctrinal analysis of classical sources, a comparative legal approach, and contextual examination of the contemporary public activity of Dagestani theologians. The study examines the principles of uṣūl al-fiqh, the strict hierarchy of legal sources, and the requirement of evidentiary proof (dalīl), which limit arbitrary interpretation of sacred texts. Particular attention is paid to the Sunni doctrine of takfīr, including the system of conditions and impediments governing its application, as well as the distinction between major sin and disbelief. It is demonstrated that the concepts of maṣlaḥah and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah establish a normative framework aimed at preserving religion, life, intellect, progeny, and property as the higher objectives of Islamic law. The article concludes that the Shafi‘i–Ash‘ari tradition functions not as an external political construct but as an internally grounded theological mechanism for safeguarding religious identity and social stability.
About the Authors
Ahmad Shiekh MoustafaRussian Federation
Shiekh Moustafa Ahmad , PhD (Curricula and Arabic Teaching Methods), Lecturer at the Department of Religious and Humanitarian Studies
Bolgar
R. S. Abutov
Russian Federation
Rajab S. Abutov , master’s Student
Bolgar
References
1. Shagaviev D.A. Theological concepts as a factor in the formation of the personalityof a religious radical. Countering the spread of extremism and terrorism ideology among youth:Proceedings of the Interregional Scientific and Practical Conference. Ufa, 2017, рр. 62–69.(In Russian)
2. Al-Shafi‘i, Muhammad ibn Idris. Al-Risalah. Ahmad Muhammad Shakir Cairo:Mustafa al-Babi al-Halabi wa Awladuh; 1938. 601 p. (In Arabic)
3. Al-Nawawi, Yahya ibn Sharaf. Al-Minhaj fi Sharh Sahih Muslim. Vol. 1. Beirut: DarIhya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabi; 1972. 245 p. (In Arabic)
4. Al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid Muhammad ibn Muhammad. Al-Iqtisad fi al-I‘tiqad.‘Abdallah Muhammad al-Khalili (ed.). Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah; 2004. 138 p.(In Arabic)
5. Al-Bukhari, Muhammad ibn Isma‘il. Al-Jami‘ al-Sahih al-Mukhtasar min UmurRasul Allah ﷺ wa Sunanihi wa Ayyamihi. Vol. 8. Cairo: Al-Matba‘a al-Kubra al-Amiriyyah;1311 AH. 176 р. (In Arabic)
6. Ibn Taymiyyah, Ahmad ibn ‘Abd al-Halim. Majmu‘ al-Fatawa. Vol. 12. Mecca:King Fahd Complex for the Printing of the Holy Qur’an; 2004. 600 р. (In Arabic)
7. Al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid Muhammad ibn Muhammad. Al-Mustasfa. Beirut: Daral-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah; 1993. 383 p. (In Arabic)
8. Al-Shatibi, Abu Ishaq Ibrahim ibn Musa. Al-Muwafaqat. Vol. 1. Jeddah: Dar Ibn‘Affan; 1997. 590 p. (In Arabic)
9. Al-Nawawi, Yhya ibn Sharaf. Al-Minhaj fi Sharh Sahih Muslim. Vol. 12. Beirut: DarIhya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabi; 1972. 245 p. (In Arabic)
10. Ibn al-Salah, ‘Uthman ibn ‘Abd al-Rahman. Ma‘rifat Anwa‘ ‘Ulum al-Hadith. Nural-Din ‘Itr (ed.). Damascus: Dar al-Fikr; 1986. 408 р. (In Arabic)
11. Al-Nawawi, Muhyi al-Din ibn Sharaf. Al-Majmu‘ Sharh al-Muhadhdhab. Vol. 1.Cairo: Idarat al-Tiba‘ah al-Muniriyyah; 1347 AH. 530 p. (In Arabic)
Review
For citations:
Shiekh Moustafa A., Abutov R.S. The methodology of the shafi‘i madhhab and the ash‘ari school of ‘aqidah as a factor in countering religious extremism. Minbar. Islamic Studies. 2026;19(2):378-388. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2026-19-2-378-388
JATS XML


















