Ibn-Rushd (Averroes). On the Methods of Proof for the Principles of Creed. Part Four
https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2019-12-2-463-498
Abstract
This is a continuation of the publication of the translation into Russian of IbnRushd’s treatise, in which he criticizes the principles of Kalam theology, especially those of Asharites, and juxtaposes them to the Quranic arguments. The present part deals with the first two questions from the fifth section “God’s deeds” – the creation of the world and the sending of the prophets. The author defends the eternalist view on the phenomenon of Creation, which was typical for the falsafa. He also suggests an original concept of two types of miracle as a proof for the authenticity of Prophetic missions.
About the Authors
T. Ibrahim
Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tawfik Ibrahim, Ph. D habil., Professor, Head Research Fellow at the Department of Arabic and Islamic Centre
Deputy Head Chairman of the Higher Examining Body (Section Theology) at the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation, Advisor to the periodical Minbar
Translation from Arabic into Russian, comments and introduction
N. V. Efremova
Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia V. Efremova, Ph. D, Senior Research Fellow at the Division of Oriental Philosophies
an Minbar. Islamic Studies Editorial board Member
Translation from Arabic into Russian, comments and introduction
References
1. Ibrahim T. K., Efremova N. V. Islamic religious philosophy: The Falsafa. Kazan: Kazan University; 2014. (In Russ.).
2. Ibrahim T. K. On the conception of eternal creation. Islam in the modern world. 2018;14(3):25–46. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22311/2074-1529-2018-14-3-25-46.
3. Ibn-Rushd. The Harmony of Religion and Philosophy. In: Ibrahim T. K., Efremova N. V. (eds) Muslim philosophy (Falsafa): An Anthology. Kazan: Spiritual Directorate of Muslims of the Republic of Tatarstan; 2009. Pp. 547–581. (In Russ.)
4. Ibn-Rushd. The Incoherence of the Incoherence. In: Medieval Arab-Muslim philosophy in A.V. Sagadeevs’ translation. Moscow: Marjani; 2010. Vol. 3, pp. 143–293. (In Russ.)
5. Averroes. The Incoherence of the Incoherence. Kiev: UTsIMM; St Petersburg: Aleteiya; 1999. (in Russ.).
6. Ibrahim T. K. Religious philosophy of Islam: Kalam. Kazan: Kazan University; 2013. (In Russ.).
7. Ibrahim T., Efremova N. V. On Ibn Rushd’s critics of Asharite Kalam. Minbar. Islamic Studies. 2018;11(3):553–562. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31162/2618-9569-2018-11-3-553-562.
8. Sahīh al-Bukhārī. Damascus-Beirut: Dār Ibn-Kathīr; 2002. (In Arabic).
9. Sahīh Muslim. Riyadh: Dār as-salām; 2000. (In Arabic).
Review
For citations:
Ibrahim T., Efremova N.V. Ibn-Rushd (Averroes). On the Methods of Proof for the Principles of Creed. Part Four. Minbar. Islamic Studies. 2019;12(2):463-498. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2019-12-2-463-498
Views:
1125
Email this article 