From ‘community’ to ‘nation’: indian muslims in the concepts of british orientalists
https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2019-12-3-703-725
Abstract
Indian Muslims were initially viewed by British Orientalists as a foreign and alien element in the Indian society, as cruel invaders who came to spread their religion “at the tip of their swords”. According to these concepts, the Indian population was divided into two homogeneous and hostile “communities”, that is Hindus (including Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, etc.) and Muslims. Such perception ignored two aspects of crucial importance: first, it did not take into consideration various regional, social, ethno-cultural, linguistic and other differences within each of the imagined “communities”; second, the majority of the Indian Muslims were not descendants of the invaders, but local people converted to Islam. Through preservation of many elements of their pre-Islamic past, they were, and still are, closer to the Hindus of their respective regions concerning language, culture and lifestyle, than to their co-believers in other areas of India, or foreign countries. These orientalist concepts served as the basis of British colonial policy; through education system and press they were communicated to the local elites, who not only began to think in terms of homogeneous religious “communities”, but, quite logically, transformed them into the “nations”, thus laying ground for communalist trends in Indian nationalism. In this way, the “two nations theory” was born. Its implementation was the idea of Pakistan and the bloody partition of British India in 1947.
About the Author
E. Yu. VaninaRussian Federation
Evgeniya Y. Vanina - Chief Research Fellow, Institute of Oriental Studies Russian Academy of Sciences.
Moscow.
References
1. Mitter Partha. Much Maligned Monsters. A History of European Reactions to Indian Art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1992. 351 p.
2. Subrahmanyam Sanjay. Mughals and Franks. Explorations in Connected History. Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2005. 232 p.
3. Barbosa Duarte. The Book of Duarte Barbosa. An Account of the Countries Bordering on the Indian Ocean and Their Inhabitants. Tr. by M. L. Dames. Vol. I. London: Hakluyt Society; 1918. 238 p.
4. Luchitskaya S.I. Obraz drugogo: musulmane v khronikakh krestovykh pokhodov (Image of the Other: Muslims in the Chronicles of the Chrusades).St. Petersburg: Aleteya; 2001. 396 p. (In Russ.)
5. Said E. Orientalism. Western Conceptions of the Orient. London: Penguin; 2003. 379 р.
6. [Manrique Sebastian]. Travels of Fray Sebastien Manrique, 1629–1643. Vol. II. London: Hakluyt Society; 1927. 504 p.
7. Vasilyeva L.A. Ot “shahskogo dvora” do yazika urdu (From the “Shah` s Court” to Urdu language). Yazik do Indii dovedet. Pamyati A.T. Aksyonova (Language Will Bring you to India. A.T. Aksyonov Memorial Volume). Ed. by Irina Glushkova. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura; 2008: 275–308 (In Russ.)
8. Vanina E.Yu. Po Indii bez yazika (evropeiskiye puteshestvenniki XV–XVII v.). In India Without Language (European Travellers. Fifteenth to Seventeenth Century). Yazik do Indii dovedet. Pamyati A.T. Aksyonova (Language Will Bring you to India. A.T. Aksyonov Memorial Volume). Ed. By Irina Glushkova. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura; 2008: 254–274 (In Russ.)
9. Curtis M. Orientalism and Islam. European Thinkers on Oriental Despotism in the Middle East and India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. 382 p
10. Jones W. The Third Anniversary Discourse (delivered 2 February, 1786, by the President, at the Asiatick Society of Bengal). The Works of Sir William Jones. With a Life of the Author, by Lord Teignmouth [John Shore]. Vol. III. London: John Stockdale and John Walker; 1807. 397 р.
11. Dow A. The history of Hindostan, from the death of Akbar, to the complete settlement of the empire under Aurunzebe. To which are prefixed, I. A dissertation on the origin and nature of despotism in Hindostan. II. An enquiry into the state of Bengal; with a plan for restoring that kingdom to its former prosperity and splendor. By Alexander Dow. Vol. III. London, Printed for T. Becket and P.A. De Hondt; 1770–72. 582 р.
12. On the attempt to send missionaries to convert the Hindoos and Mosselmen. Warren Hastings Papers. Vol. XXII (ff.141). Papers Relating to India and the East. British Library Add MS 39892: 1740–1827, f. 61. 61р.
13. Vanina E. Yu. Indiya: istoriya v istorii (India: a History in History). Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura; 2014. 328 p.
14. Muller F. M. India: what can it teach us? A course of lectures delivered before the University of Cambridge. London: Longmans, Green; 1883 (www. gutenberg.org, Assessed 16.04.2019).
15. Mill J. History of British India. Vol. II. Delhi: Associated Publishing House, reprint; 1972. 538 р.
16. The History of India as Told by Its Own Historians. The Muhammadan Period. Edited from the posthumous papers of the late Sir H. M. Elliot, K. C. B., East India Company` s Bengal Civil Service, by Professor John Dowson, M. R. A. S., Staff College, Sandhurst. Vol. I. London: Trübner; 1867. 541 р.
17. Robinson F. The `Ulama of Farangi Mahal and Islamic Culture in South Asia. London: Hurst & Co; 2001. 267 р.
18. Hunter W.W. The Indian Musalmans. Are They Bound in Conscience to Rebel Against the Queen? London: Trubner; 1871. 214 p.
19. Banerjee A. C. Two Nations: the Philosophy of Muslim Nationalism. Delhi: Concept Publishing Company; 1981. 286 р.
20. Shackle C. (tr.). Sayyid Ahmad Khan (1817–1898). Lessons from London. Nationalism in the Vernacular. Hindi, Urdu and the Literature of Indian Freedom. An anthology edited by Shobna Nijhavan with Introduction by Vasudha Dalmia and Christopher Shackle. Delhi: Permanent Black; 2010: 377–384.
21. Taneeva-Salomatshayeva L.Z. Istoki sufizma v srednevekovoi Indii: bratstvo Chishtiya (Origins of Sufism in India: the Chishtiya Brotherhood). Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura; 2009. 312 p. (In Russ.)
22. Suvorova A.A. Musulmanskiye svyatiye Yuzhnoi Azii XI – XV vekov (Muslim Saints of South Asia, XI to XVth century). Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences ; 1999; 280 p. (In Russ.)
23. van der Veer P. The Foreign Hand: Orientalist Discourse in Sociology and Communalism. Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament. Ed. by Carol A. Breckenridge and Peter van der Veer. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1993: 23–44.
24. Vanina T.Yu. Srednevekovoye mishleniye: indiiski variant (Medieval Mentality: an Indian Variant). Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura; 2007. 373 p. (In Russ.)
25. Appadurai A. Number in the Colonial Imagination. Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament. Ed. by Carol A. Breckenridge and Peter van der Veer. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 199: 314–340.
26. Maulana Abul Kalam Azad. Selected Speeches and Writings. Hyderabad: Abul Kalam Azad Oriental Research Institute; 2007. 154 р.
27. Yurlov F. N., Yurlova E.S. Istoriya Indii, XXth vek (History of India, the Twentieth Century). Moscow: IVRAN; 2010. 920 p.
28. Sir Syed Ahmad Khan. “Dostoiniue lyudi” I “didkiye zhivotniye” (Iz “Puteshestviya v London”) “Worthy People” and “Wild Animals” (from “Travels to London”).Tr. by L. Vasilyeva. Pod nebom Yuzhnoi Azii. Khula I Khvala. Kommunikativniye modalnosti istoricheskogo I kulturnogo svoeobraziya (Under the Skies of South Asia. Censure and Praise. Communicative Modalities of Historical and Cultural Specificity). General ed. Irina Glushkova. Ed. Eugenia Vanina. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura; 2017: 507–513. (In Russ.)
29. Hafeez Malik. Political Profile of Sir Sayyid Ahmad Khan: a Documentary Record. Islamabad: Institute of Islamic History, Culture and Civilization; 1982. 400 р.
30. Belokrenitsky V. Ya., Moskalenko V.M. Istoriya Pakistana – XX v. (History of Pakistan – the Twentieth Century). Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences , Craft+; 2008. 567 р. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Vanina E.Yu. From ‘community’ to ‘nation’: indian muslims in the concepts of british orientalists. Minbar. Islamic Studies. 2019;12(3):703-725. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2019-12-3-703-725