«Thanks to the Tatars – they are my main resource...» (The case of Gabidulla Kurbangaliev and the problem of cooperation between the leaders of the Black Hundred movement and right-wing figures among Muslims)
https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2020-13-4-763-793
Abstract
The article is devoted to the issues of cooperation of Muslim religious leaders with the leaders of the right-wing monarchist (Black Hundred) movement. As an example, the case of ishan Gabidulla Kurbangaliev (1859–1919) is considered, whose attorney was the well-known right-wing politician, lawyer Boris V. Nikolsky (1870–1919). Based on archival documents, in particular, the materials of this case, the author raises the question: Why were Muslims with right-wing views not seriously considered as ideological allies by the leadership of the Black Hundred movement?
About the Author
R. I. Bekkin
Institute of Oriental Studies at the Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia;
Institute for African Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Renat I. Bekkin, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences; D.Sc. in Economics, Ph.D. in Religious Studies, Cand. Sc. in Law; Professor at the Institute of Oriental Studies at the Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia; Leading Research Fellow at the Institute for African studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
St. Petersburg; Moscow
References
1. Davidenko A.V. Evolyutsiya pravomonarkhicheskikh koncepciy politicheskogo ustroistva Rossii (1900–1917 gg.): аvtoref. dis. ... kand. istor. nauk. [Evolution of the right-monarchist concepts of the political structure of Russia (1900–1917). Dissertation in History thesis abstract]. Habarovsk, 2001. 27 p. (In Russian)
2. Razmolodin M.L. Russkiy vopros v ideologii chernoi sotni [The Russianquestion in the ideology of the Black Hundred movement]. Yaroslavl: Nyuans; 2013. 480 p. (In Russian)
3. Bekkin R.I. Perepiska B.V. Nikolskogo s liderami partii «Sirat al-Mustaqim» [Correspondence of V.V. Nikolsky with the leaders of the Sirat al-Mustaqim party]. Vostochnyj arkhiv [Oriental Archive]. 2019;2(40):33–44. (In Russian)
4. Mikhailova E.M. Ideologiya pravogo monarkhizma v mnogonatsionalnom Povolzhye v nachale XX v sootnoshenie natsionalnogo i sotsialnogo aspektov [The ideology of right-wing monarchism in the multinational Volga region at the beginning of the 20th century, the ratio of national and social aspects]. Agrarnyi stroi Srednego Povolzhya v etnicheskom izmerenii [The Agrarian System of the Middle Volga Region in the Ethnic Dimension]. Moscow: Institut nauchnoi informatsii po obshchestvennym naukam RAN RF [Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences]; 2005, pp. 489–496. (In Russian)
5. Mikhailova E.M. Natsionalnyi vopros v ideologii i praktike pravykh partiy i organizatsiy Povolzhya (1905–1917 gg.) [The National Question in the Ideology and Practice of Right-Wing Parties and Organizations in the Volga Region (1905–1917)]. Etnos i lichnost: istoricheskiy put, problemy i perspektivy razvitiya: materialy mezhregionalnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Ethnicity and Personality: Historical Path, Problems and Development Prospects: Materials of the Interregional Scientific and Practical Conference]. Moscow – Cheboksary, 2003, pp. 150–153. (In Russian)
6. Bekkin R.I. K voprosu o vzaimodeistvii musulmanskogo dukhovenstva s liderami chernosotennogo dvizheniya (na primere Ataully i Muhammed-Safy Bayazitovykh) [On the question of the interaction of the Muslim clergy with the leaders of the Black Hundred movement (by the example of Ataullah and Mohammed-Safa Bayazitov)]. Trudy Gosudarstvennogo muzeya istorii religii [Proceedings of the State Museum of the History of Religion]. 2017;17:237–244. (In Russian)
7. Bekkin R.I. «Ya ne znayu, kakoi chelovek akhun...» (V.S. Solovyov i A. Bayazitov: proiskhozhdenie odnogo mifa) [«I do not know what kind of person akhun is…» (V.S. Solovyov and A. Bayazitov: the genesis of one myth)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 7: Filosofiya [Moscow State University Bulletin. Philosophy series–7]. 2018;(1):99–112. (In Russian)
8. Bekkin R.I. «Rabochie mne ugrozhali ubijstvom za naznachenie Bayazitova…»: M.S. Bayazitov i delo leningradskih mull 1932 goda [«Workers Threatened to Kill Me for Appointing Bayazitov…»: M.-S. Bayazitov and the Case of Leningrad Mullahs of 1932]. Noveishaya istoriya Rossii [Modern History of Russia].2019;9(4):1058–1072. (In Russian)
9. Yunusova A.B. Islam v Bashkortostane [Islam in Bashkortostan]. Ufa, 1999. 352 p. (In Russian)
10. Nikolsky B.V. Dnevnik. 1896–1918 [A diary. 1896–1918]. Vol. 2: 1904–1918. St. Petersburg: Dmitriy Bulanin; 2015. 652 p. (In Russian)
11. Nikolsky B.V. Dnevnik. 1896–1918 [A diary. 1896–1918]. Vol. 1: 1896–1903. St. Petersburg: Dmitriy Bulanin; 2015. 703 p. (In Russian)
12. Rodnov M. Bashkiry na stranitsakh uralskoi pressy nachala XX veka[Bashkirs on the Pages of the Ural Press of the Early XX century]. Belskie prostory. 2008;6(115):140–148. (In Russian)
13. Yunusova A.B. Kurbangalievy [The Kurbangalievs]. Islam na territorii byvshei Rossiyskoi imperii: entsiklopedicheskiy slovar [Islam in the Territory of the Former Russian Empire: an Encyclopaedic Dictionary]. Vol. I. Moscow, 2018, p. 229. (In Russian)
14. Ahsanov K. Balkanskaya voyna. Tatarskaya obshchestvennopoliticheskaya mysl i Krym [Balkan War. Tatar Socio-Political Thought and the Crimea]. Krymskoe istoricheskoe obozrenie [Crimean Historical Review]. 2014;(1):8–20.(In Russian)
15. Nikolsky B.V. Sokrushit kramolu [Crush the Sedition]. Moscow: Institute of Russian civilization; 2009. 464 p. (In Russian)
16. Khakimov R.Sh. Kurbangalievy: sled v istorii islama yuzhnogo Urala [The Kurbangalievs: a trace in the history of Islam in the Southern Urals]. Islam i islamovedenie v sovremennoi Rossii. Sbornik dokladov Vserossiyskogo islamovedcheskogo foruma [Islam and Islamic Studies in Modern Russia. Collection of reports of the AllRussian Islamic Studies Forum]. Makhachkala, 2019, pp. 267–275. (In Russian)
17. Stogov D. Predislovie [Foreword]. Nikolsky B.V. Sokrushit kramolu [Crush the Sedition]. Moscow: Institute of Russian civilization; 2009, pp. 5–46. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Bekkin R.I. «Thanks to the Tatars – they are my main resource...» (The case of Gabidulla Kurbangaliev and the problem of cooperation between the leaders of the Black Hundred movement and right-wing figures among Muslims). Minbar. Islamic Studies. 2020;13(4):763-793. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2020-13-4-763-793
Views:
1200
Email this article 