The problem of the Total Subject in the Methodology of Theology
https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2021-14-3-614-624
Abstract
The article deals with the aspect of an attitude towards a person, researching Theological Discourse.
The article reveals the processes of marginalizing the so-called Subjective and Objective Faith. Thus, the theological discourse is directed precisely to an objective-oriented faith, since it seems more real for a person, and it necessarily comes from him. Separation of faith, on the one hand, is a language trick shown directly through the language and processes of linguistic distinction (the opposition); on the other hand, through an array of determinations of one’s faith according to the traditions, culture, family and society as a whole. As a result, the authors point out that this division shows the opacity of a human being according to his/er own nature, which leads to a person wholeness collapse. As a result, some possible problems related to the methodology based on the concept of the total subject are identifi ed.
About the Authors
G. A. Galyavieva
Russian Islamic Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Gulnaz A. Galyavieva, Cand. Sci. (Pedagogy), Associate Professor of the Department of Islamic Theology
Kazan
A. V. Pisarenko
Russian Islamic Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Artur V. Pisarenko, student of Theological Faculty
Kazan
References
1. Shmaliy V. K voprosu o predmete i specifi ke teologii [To the question of the subject and the specifi cs of theology]. Teologiya v sisteme nauchnogo znaniya i obrazovaniya. Materialy slushaniy Obshchestvennoy palaty Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Theology in the system of scientifi c knowledge and education. Materials of the Russian Federation Public Chamber hearings]. [Electronic source]. Available at: https://textarchive.ru/c-1610160-pall.html (Accessed: 19.01.2021). (In Russian)
2. Rozhkov V.P. Istoriko-fi losofskoe obosnovanie predmeta i metodologii teologii v vuzah RF. [Historical and philosophical justifi cation of the subject and methodology of Theology in the universities of the Russian Federation]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Filosofi ya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika. [Bulletin of Saratov University. New series. Series: Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy]. 2016;16(3):306–310. (In Russian)
3. Shokhin V.K. O problemah integracii teologii v sisteme obrazovaniya i akademicheskih nauk [On the problems of integration of Theology in the system of education and academic sciences]. Teologiya v sisteme nauchnogo znaniya i obrazovaniya. Materialy slushaniy Obshchestvennoy palaty Rossiyskoy Federatsii Federatsii [Theology in the system of scientifi c knowledge and education. Materials of the Russian Federation Public Chamber hearings]. Moscow: Ed. Public Chamber of the Russian Federation; 2009, рр. 28–32 (In Russian)
4. Al-Ghazali M. Nravstvennost’ musul’manina [The morality of a Muslim]. Rustamov I.A. (trans.). Kiev: Ansar Foundation; 2003. 364 p. (In Russian)
5. Kommentarii imama Akmalyuddina al’-Babirti k zaveshchaniyu (“al’- Vasyya”) imama Abu Hanify [Comments of Imam Akmalyuddin al-Babirti on The Will (“al-Wasya”) by Imam Abu Hanif]. Kazan: Khuzur Publishing House; 2019. 144 p. (In Russian)
6. Chumicheva O.V. Paradoksy “cherkasskoj very”: mezhdu islamom, hristianstvom i yazycheskimi tradiciyami [Paradoxes of the “Cherkassk faith”: among Islam, Christianity and Pagan traditions]. Arheologiya i etnologiya severnogo Kavkaza [Archeology and Ethnology of the North Caucasus]. 2017;7:133–145. (In Russian)
7. Boymatov S.Z. Rol’ nravstvennogo vliyaniya na formirovanie “rol’ nravstvennogo vliyaniya na formirovanie” nravstvennykh kachestv lichnosti [The role of moral infl uence on the formation of “the role of moral infl uence on the formation” of moral qualities of an individual]. Nauka i novye tekhnologii [Science and new technologies]. 2007;3–4:112–113. (In Russian)
8. Bibikhin V.V. Slovo i sobytie. Pisatel’ i literatura [Word and event. Writer and literature]. Moscow: Dmitry Pozharsky University; 2010. 416 p. (In Russian)
9. Khaustov D.S. Lekcii po fi losofi i postmoderna [Lectures on Postmodern Philosophy]. Moscow: RIPOLL classic; 2018. 288 p. (In Russian)
10. Devyatova S.V. Problemy metodologii sovremennoy khristianskoy teologii [Problems of methodology of Modern Christian Theology]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 7: Filosofi ya, sotsiologiya i sotsial’nye tekhnologii [Volgograd State University Bulletin. Episode 7: Philosophy, Sociology and Social Technology]. 2016;4(34):36–42. (In Russian)
11. Orlov M.O., Polokhov D.N., Petrova K.Yu. Teologiya v sisteme gumanitarnyh nauk: osobennosti predmeta i metodologii [Theology in the system of Humanities: features of subject and methodology]. Vestnik Russkoj hristianskoj gumanitarnoj akademii [Bulletin of Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy]. 2019;4:313–323. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Galyavieva G.A., Pisarenko A.V. The problem of the Total Subject in the Methodology of Theology. Minbar. Islamic Studies. 2021;14(3):614-624. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2021-14-3-614-624
Views:
543
Email this article 