Main Islamic Methodological Approaches: Searching for Optimal Ways of Training Russian Muslim Theologians
https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2025-18-3-643-664
Abstract
The presented research attempts to comprehend the main Islamic methodological approaches, starting with those developed in the classical period of the formation of Islamic theological thought, and ending with modern epistemological alternatives proposed by the representatives of the moderately traditionalist and integrative Islamic thought. At the beginning of the paper, the methodological foundation of Islamic theological research is considered, that is represented by two fundamental principles of Islam – the principle of monotheism (mabda’ al-tawhid) and the principle of tradition (mabda’ al-naql), as well as methodological supports in the form of an integrative principle (mabda’ takamul), the principle of unity in diversity (mabda’ al-tawhid fi al-ikhtilaf) and the principle of a holistic approach in education (...), contributing to a harmonious combination of Islamic and secular approaches in the research activities of modern theological researchers. Then the author provides the information about six main Muslim methodological schools formed at the dawn of Islamic thought, four of which (Ahl al-Hadith, Ash‘ari, Maturidi, Sufi) represent the doctrine of orthodox Sunni (traditional) Islam, having unanimity in fundamental issues and diversity in secondary ones, creating methodological polyphony. Then, modern Islamic methodological trends (modernism, neo-modernism, ultramodernism), which are different from the traditional ones, are analyzed, challenging the Islamic tradition (naql), which no longer indicates polyphony, but methodological dissonance, the answer to which was Islamic neotraditionalism, aimed at overcoming methodological chaos (imbalance). As a result of the analysis of various Islamic methodological trends, starting from the “pre-modern” era and ending with the “modern” period, in conclusion, the most optimal methodological approaches for the training of Muslim theologians in Russia are proposed, represented by the moderate traditionalist approach of M.Sa‘id M. Ramadan al-Buti and the concept of knowledge integration (takamul al-ma‘rifah), developed by representatives of the school of Islamic integrative thought, offering specific Islamic methodological alternatives to the modern secular space.
Keywords
UDC: 297.1
About the Author
T. E. SedankinaRussian Federation
Tatyana E. Sedankina, Cand. Sci. (Pedagogy), Associate Professor, the Head of the Department of Systematic Theology; Associate Professor, Department of Theology
Kazan; Bolgar
References
1. Mourad Laabdi, Aziz Elbittioui. From Aslamat al-Ma‘rifa to al-Takāmul al-Ma‘rifī: a study of the shift from islamization to integration of knowledge. Religions. 2024;15(3),342:1–16. DOI: 10.3390/rel15030342
2. Abu Mansur al'-Maturidi. Kniga edinobozhiya (Kitab at-tauhid). Seriya: Klassicheskoe bogoslovskoe nasledie [The Book of Monotheism (Kitab al-Tawhid). Series: Classical Theological Heritage]. Adygamov R.K. (tr. from Arabic.). Kazan: Russian Islamic Institute Publ.; 2023. 538 p. (In Russian)
3. Abu Dzha‘far at-Tahavi. Akyda at-Tahavijja. Raz"yasnenie veroubezhdeniya Ahlju-s-Sunna val' Dzhama‘a [al-‘Aqidah al-Tahawiyyah. Explanation of the Creed of Ahl al-Sunnah wal Jama‘ah]. 1 ed. Kazan: «Huzur – Spokojstvie» Publishing House;; 2020. 48 p. (In Russian)
4. Abu Hafs Nadzhm ad-Din an-Nasafi. Islamskoe veroubezhdenie: “Al'-Akaid an-Nasafija” [Islamic Creed: Al-‘Aqa’id al-Nasafiyyah]. Mutailov M.M. (tr. from Arabic.). Stavropol: North Caucasus State Technical University Publ.; 2009. 32 p. (In Russian)
5. Abu Hamid al-Ghazali. “Ihja’ ‘ulum ad-din” Vozrozhdenie religioznyh nauk [“Ihya’ ‘Ulum al-Din” Revival of religious sciences]. Vol. 1. Nasyrov I.R., Atsaev A.S. (tr. from Arabic). Moscow: Nurul Irshad Press; 2007. 584 p. (In Russian)
6. Abu Hamid al-Ghazali. “Ihja’ ‘ulum ad-din” Vozrozhdenie religioznyh nauk [“Ihya’ ‘Ulum al-Din” Revival of religious sciences]. Vol. 2. Nasyrov I.R., Atsaev A.S. (tr. from Arabic). Moscow: Nurul Irshad Press; 2011. 460 p. (In Russian)
7. Abu Hamid al-Ghazali. “Ihja’ ‘ulum ad-din” Vozrozhdenie religioznyh nauk [“Ihya’ ‘Ulum al-Din” Revival of religious sciences]. Vol. 3. Nasyrov I.R., Atsaev A.S. (tr. from Arabic). Moscow: Nurul Irshad Press; 2011. 288 p. (In Russian)
8. Muhammad Said Ramadan al-Buty. Islamskoe verouchenie i filosofija [Islamic doctrine and philosophy]. Kazan: Russian Islamic Institute Publ.; 2023. 399 p. (In Russian)
9. Muhammad Said Ramadan al-Buty. Salafija [Salafiyyah]. Popov I. (tr. from Arabic). Moscow: Ansar Publishing House; 2008. 240 p. (In Russian)
10. Isma‘il Radzhi al-Faruki. At-Tavhӣd: ego posledstviya v myshlenii i zhizni [Al-Tawhid: its consequences in thinking and life]. Kozakov S.V., Shamhalova Z.A. (tr. from Engl). 1 ed. Institute of Knowledge Integration Publ.; 2024. 304 p. (In Russian)
11. Seid Muhammad Nakib al'-Attas. Vvedenie v metafiziku Islama – izlozhenie osnovopolagajushhih jelementov musul'manskogo mirovozzrenija [Introduction to the Metaphysics of Islam - An Outline of the Fundamental Elements of the Muslim Worldview]. Tr. from Engl. Kjamilev Said H., Taufik Ibragim (ed.). Moscow: Kuala Lumpur Press; 2001. 412 p. (In Russian)
12. Ermakov D.V. al-Hanābila. Islam: entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' [Islam: encyclopedic dictionary]. Prozorov S.M. (ed.). Moscow: Nauka Press, Main editorial office of oriental literature; 1991, pp. 271–272. (In Russian)
13. Ermakov D.V. Ahmad b. Hanbal. Islam: entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' [Islam: encyclopedic dictionary]. Prozorov S.M. (ed.). Moscow: Nauka Press, Main editorial office of oriental literature; 1991, pp. 30–31. (In Russian)
14. Sidorov V.A. Islamskiy traditsionalizm v post-sovremennom mire (ahl'-sunna i ahyr-zaman) [Islamic Traditionalism in the Post-Modern World (Ahl Sunnah and Akhir Zaman)]. Doklad na kruglom stole «Islamskie traditsionalisty i islam traditsionalistov». Institut filosofii im. G. Skovorody Natsional'noy akademii nauk Ukrainy [Report at the round table "Islamic traditionalists and Islam of traditionalists". G. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine]. Kiev, 2014. [Electronic source]. Available at: http://politosophia.org/page/islamskiy-traditsionalizm-v-post-sovremennom-mire.html (Accessed: 20.07.2025). (In Russian)
15. Abdel'vahab el'-Affendi. Ljudi na kromke: religioznaja reforma i bremja zapadnyh musul'manskih intellektualov. Seriya neperiodicheskikh publikatsiĭ [People on the Edge: Religious Reform and the Burden of Western Muslim Intellectuals. Non-periodical publication series]. Melikova L. (tr.). London, Washington: Institute of Knowledge Integration; 2022. № 19. 62 p. (In Russian)
16. Sjedzhvik M. Naperekor sovremennomu miru: Traditsionalizm i taynaya intellektual'naya istoriya XX veka [Against the Modern World: Traditionalism and the Secret Intellectual History of the 20th Century]. Marshak M. (Chapters 1–5), Lazarev A. (tr. from Engl.). Falikov B. (ed.). Moscow: New Literary Review Publ; 2014. 536 p. (In Russian)
17. Hamza Jusuf – dervish epokhi postmodernizma v pustyne smysla [Hamza Yusuf: A Postmodern Dervish in the Desert of Meaning]. [Electronic source]. Available at: http://islamosfera.ru/xamza-yusuf-dervish-epoxi-postmodernizma-v-pustyne-smysla/ (Accessed: 22.07.2025). (In Russian)
18. V poiskakh svoego Gospoda: put' ot Timoti Vintera do Abdala Khakima Murada [In Search of Your Lord: The Journey from Timothy Winter to Abdal Hakim Murad]. [Electronic source]. Available at: https://islamosfera.ru/v-poiskax-svoego-gospoda-put-ot-timoti-vintera-do-abdala-xakima-murada/ (Accessed: 22.07.2025). (In Russian)
19. Imam Zayd Shakir – novoobrashchennyy musul'manin i dukhovnyy nastavnik Mukhammada Ali [Imam Zayd Shakir – a Muslim convert and spiritual mentor of Muhammad Ali]. [Electronic source]. Available at: https://vk.com/@islamosfera-imam-zaid-shakir-novoobraschennyi-musulmanin-i-duhovnyi-nast) (Accessed: 22.07.2025). (In Russian)
20. Shaikh Abdal-Hakim Murad. Muslim loyalty and belonging some reflections on the psychosocial background. 2003. [Electronic source]. Available at: http://www.masud.co.uk/ISLAM/ahm/loyalty.htm (Accessed: 17.04.2025).
21. Sedankina T.E. Metodologicheskiy podkhod Ramadana al'-Buty v teologii: mezhdu Stsilloy i Kharibdoy [Ramadan al-Buti’s methodological approach in Theology: between Scylla and Charybdis]. Minbar. Islamic Studies. 2025;18(1):173–198. DOI: 10.31162/2618-9569-2025-18-1-173-198 (In Russian)
22. Fathi Hasan Malkavi. Integracija poznanija. Osnovy islamskoj metodologii [Integration of knowledge. Fundamentals of Islamic methodology]. Almazova L. (tr. from Engl.). Moscow: The International Institute of Islamic Thought Publ.; 2023. 499 p. (In Russian)
23. Taha Dzhabir al'-Al'vani. Edinobozhie, ochishchenie i sozidanie: popytki raskrytiya osnovopolagayushchikh printsipov i tseley Korana [Monotheism, Purification and Creation: Attempts to Reveal the Fundamental Principles and Purposes of the Quran]. Vahit Sulejman (tr. from Engl.). 1 ed. Institute of Knowledge Integration Publ.; 2025. 162 p. (In Russian)
24. Recep Senturk et al. Comparative Theories and Methods: Between Uniplexity and Multiplexity. Istanbul: Ibn Haldun University Press; 2020. 456 p. (In Turkish)
25. Narozhdayushchiesya epistemologii: Izmenyayushchayasya tkan' znaniya v postprivychnoe vremya [Emerging Epistemologies: The Changing Fabric of Knowledge in Post-Habitual Times]. Muzykina E. (tr.). Zijauddin Sardar (red.). 1 ed. Institute of Knowledge Integration Publ.; 2024. 348 p. (In Russian)
26. Helal Uddin, Thameem Ushama. An Analysis of Ziauddin Sardar's Approach to Integration of Knowledge. Journal of Islam in Asia. December Issue. 2024;21(3):265–267.
Review
For citations:
Sedankina T.E. Main Islamic Methodological Approaches: Searching for Optimal Ways of Training Russian Muslim Theologians. Minbar. Islamic Studies. 2025;18(3):643-664. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2025-18-3-643-664





















